Monday, March 24, 2008

A Lesson in Canadian Health Care

For all those folks who think that Hillary Clinton's and Barack Obama's visions of health care are for you, consider this story.

The granddaughter of an acquaintance and her her family live in Canada.

The granddaughter and her mothers came to Illinois to visit this Easter.

But, it wasn't to celebrate the Holy Day with the family.

It was because the granddaughter's toe got hurt.

It wasn't healing.

Her mother took her to her Canadian pediatrician.

The pediatrician said she had to see a specialist. The wait was so long and the mother cared so much about her daughter that she decided to come south for medical care.

In order to prevent the long delays the Canadian system entails, the little girl came back to Illinois to see a specialist.

Maybe if the Democrats impose a similar system next year, we can go south of the border for better care.

= = = = =
On top is the Health Canada home page.

Oops, it looks like another photo got posted by mistake. Later this week, you will see how I used to symbolism of Keely Cat's doing his duty. Since it might be appropriate for this story, I left it in.

Labels: , , , , , ,


Monday, April 02, 2007

Northwest Herald Endorses Civil Unions

I don’t usually read the Northwest Herald’s editorials.

But, as anyone who knows me will attest, I do not pass up a newsstand without looking at the front pages of the news sections.

On Sunday, the Northwest Herald puts its editorial on the front page of a section, so I saw,
State ponders civil unions
From that headline, one might think there would be an “on the one hand, this, and, on the other hand, that” approach, but that was not the case.

While the headline does not advocate civil unions, the little inset for those who had not interest in reading the text did.

I think its first sentence was
We favor civil unions.
That’s a lot more straightforward than the editorial.

The editorial starts off with the assertion, “The bill does not legalize gay marriage.”

Wrong.

It does exactly that without awarding the title “marriage.”

That’s why long-time Chicago Democrat Mary Flowers voted against it. Here’s what the Chicago Tribune wrote,
"There is a fine line, and I think Rep. Harris crossed it," said Rep. Mary Flowers (D-Chicago), who opposed the bill in committee. "I think what he did is make this, indirectly, same-sex marriage but called it something else. ... Marriage is between a man and a woman."
In fact, the bill would not have gotten out of committee without the vote of North Shore Republican Beth Coulson.

But I guess folks shouldn't be too surprised by the NW Herald's endorsement.

It endorsed the Gay Games Regatta, saying it "would be good exposure for the city."

I guess readers should not be surprised, considering the paper’s cheer leading on the Gay Games’ regatta’s being held on Crystal Lake.

The paper let Crystal Lake Mayor Aaron Shepley present his praise of the Gay Games.

And it opposed the Protect Marriage advisory referendum before the petitions were even filed.

Endorsing civil unions at least shows consistency.

Coincidentally, researcher Paul Cameron, PhD, delivered his and his mathematician son Kirk’s analysis of the largest sex survey ever conducted—the 2003 Canadian Community Health survey of 121,300 adults--to the Eastern Psychological Association two days before.

The findings: only 1.4% of adults engaged in homosexual behavior.

And: 2% of 18-44 year olds, 1% of 50 year olds, and only a third of a percent of subjects 60+ considered themselves homosexual. Thus homosexual activity was much more common among younger adults.

The two Cameron PhD’s also reported findings on the ages of death of those in “gay marriages” in two northern European countries—Denmark and Norway.

Over 12 years in Denmark, homosexual partners died at an average age of 51, while men married to women died at 74. 52 versus 77 in Norway, where the sample was smaller and only over 5 years.

The figures for lesbians were similar. Those in gay marriages lived to an average age of 56 in both countries, while women married to men lived to 78 in Denmark and 81 in Norway.

The period studied in Denmark was from 1990-2002; in Norway, 1997-2002.

Cameron also refers to the obituary studies he did from the Washington Blade. After analyzing them, he concluded that homosexuals and lesbians died about 20 years earlier than the average. The Scandinavian government statistics are pretty close to his own,as you can see if you take a look at the study.

The obituary-based studies were roundly criticized by gay activists. I wonder what they think now.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?