Monday, July 31, 2006
Ferreting Out Any Huntley School District Crooks with Larry Snow’s Forensic Audit
The heat is approaching the temperature outside for the Huntley School District 158 Board of Education.The lone minority board member, Larry Snow, called for a forensic audit, but it was shot down by the Majority Six.
“Huntley School District 158 Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Forensic Audit” was the title of my article on the Majority Six’s summary rejection.
That is not what one might assume if one read the outside auditor’s management letter.
Not to mention what he said to the Board in an open meeting:
I just want you to know that people could easily be stealing money from the district.Then, a crook appeared in the payroll department. The Daily Herald found someone who said $8-10,000 was missing. As in probably stolen.
Now, the Daily Herald is editorially calling for a forensic audit as the “best way to clear 158 decks.”
What else will work for a district where “taxpayers and officials have likely felt they stepped into the world of ‘what can go wrong has gone wrong’ during the past two years,” it editorially suggests.
Some think that the only way to “clear the decks” is to make sure the Majority Six is not in absolute control after next April’s school board elections. It would be nice if Larry Snow had someone who would second his motion for a forensic audit.
Comments:
<< Home
Thank you Daily Herald - D158's residents/taxpayers/kids (the littlest taxpayers) need all the help they can get.
Forensic audit?
Absolute-uh-muhn-doh - as Fonzie might say.
The question still remains - with everything that has come out and continues to come out - does anyone wonder why the only people who don't see a problem and don't want to look into it (or anything else) are the members of the board majority?
Most have a lot of years under their belts and they steered the Good Ship 158 into the iceberg a long long time ago - let's see what's hiding under the water......
Post a Comment
Forensic audit?
Absolute-uh-muhn-doh - as Fonzie might say.
The question still remains - with everything that has come out and continues to come out - does anyone wonder why the only people who don't see a problem and don't want to look into it (or anything else) are the members of the board majority?
Most have a lot of years under their belts and they steered the Good Ship 158 into the iceberg a long long time ago - let's see what's hiding under the water......
<< Home

